SPACETRC / OPEN RESEARCH 5.0.1
Open a result.
Run its method again.
Data, method and result in one research object. Open it locally, verify integrity, recompute the analysis and inspect changes between versions.
No data request or upload occurs on page open. JSON files are processed in this browser. SHA-256 checks integrity; it does not establish authorship, scientific correctness or peer-review status.
SPACETRC / TEACHING REPORTS
Two completed examples with open sources and calculations
These are SpaceTRC educational examples prepared from source observations. They are not presented as published community research, peer-reviewed papers, new discoveries or editorial approval. They are separate from the real publication catalogue below. Opening or downloading an example loads only its selected CSV, checks its source hash and recomputes the method before preparing the file.
SpaceTRC educational example · review status: teaching content
Educational example: interval depth in the Kepler-8 light curve
What is the fractional difference between mean flux in the 120.60–120.95 BKJD baseline and the 121.08–121.17 BKJD transit interval of the quality-filtered Q0 selection? A dip is expected in this known system; this is not a new discovery or a physical planet model.
Calculated finding
Arithmetic means of 17 baseline and 4 transit points give fractional depth 0.00872729685625416 with standard error 0.00009944415266065158 from independent source errors. As percentages, the dip is about 0.87273% with standard error 0.00994 percentage points.
Full method, limitations and next investigation
Method
B and E are arithmetic means. For each interval, s = √Σσᵢ² / n, depth d = (B−E)/B; s_d = √[(E s_B/B²)² + (s_E/B)²]. Time is BKJD/TDB, not a UTC clock. Interval endpoints are included.
STScI MAST · Kepler Archive Manual
{
"baseline": [
120.6,
120.95
],
"event": [
121.08,
121.17
],
"errorMode": "reported"
}Limitations
Only independent measurement errors are propagated. Stellar activity, correlated noise, trends and instrumental systematics are not modelled. Four transit points are not a physical fit of the full transit; test sensitivity to interval choices. A standard error is not a confidence interval.
Reproduce and change
Create a new revision with transit interval 121.06–121.18 BKJD; compare depth and point count. Also compare the reported-error approach with sample scatter.
NASA Kepler / STScI MAST · KIC 6922244 · Q0 · 453 rows
Public domain · NASA Kepler / STScI MAST acknowledgement retained · Source terms. This SpaceTRC teaching report and example analysis code: CC BY 4.0; source data terms remain separate.
CSV SHA-256 496813d1b9cff371c9799a1b67731b36883829ab4ab1269e006b780f64884b06
Object SHA-256 cda1c445e78f138e1ac1b45869bb65999a122a949f32b28517b54f4e63e278fa
SpaceTRC educational example · review status: teaching content
Educational example: comparing dated NOAA Kp intervals
How do mean Kp values differ between hours 0–42 and 72–114 from the start of the retained NOAA selection for 17–23 October 2026? Include records reporting at least one station; this is not a forecast or causal test.
Calculated finding
Each interval contains 15 records. Baseline mean is 1.534, comparison mean is 2.4006666666666665, and the difference is +0.8666666666666667 Kp with independent standard error 0.3317848796271559 Kp. This difference describes only the selected windows.
Full method, limitations and next investigation
Method
For each interval, compute sample standard deviation s and standard error s/√n. Difference Δ = E−B; s_Δ = √(s_B² + s_E²). Time is hours since 17 October 2026 00:00 UTC. Apply the station filter; interval endpoints are included.
NOAA NCEI · Geomagnetic Indices
{
"baseline": [
0,
42
],
"event": [
72,
114
],
"errorMode": "scatter",
"minStations": 1
}Limitations
Kp is a quasi-logarithmic source index; the arithmetic mean is only a descriptor for this teaching calculation. Consecutive three-hour values may not be independent; effective sample size is not corrected. The selection is not live and the provider may later revise values. No alert, weather forecast or causal claim about solar effects is produced.
Reproduce and change
Keep interval lengths equal and move the windows; compare sensitivity of the mean difference to time selection. Report retained point counts when changing the station filter.
NOAA / Space Weather Prediction Center · 56 rows
NOAA public data · preserve attribution and consult source terms · Source terms. This SpaceTRC teaching report and example analysis code: CC BY 4.0; source data terms remain separate.
CSV SHA-256 143b66f177151c86dbec7efacf29b52bff8980033bf8636874dd173ed8da042e
Object SHA-256 d00f8c979e0a1ee90201cc6d7a70df88fb3754fd5ae73579a31206f73c2e0de9
Two teaching reports are ready. No data request or upload has occurred.
Open a research object
Up to 2 MB. Only defined SpaceTRC research object schema version 1 is accepted. ZIP files, general PDFs and arbitrary code are not executed. Data hash, object hash and recomputed results are checked together. Result and model comparisons allow at most 10⁻¹² absolute or relative numerical tolerance for floating-point rounding across browsers.
No file has been opened.
Result, source and reproduction
Method, units and uncertainty assumptions
Interval means and independent standard errors are descriptive educational calculations. Time-correlated noise, stellar activity and instrumental systematics are not modelled. The result is not a confidence level, new planet discovery or physical transit fit. Interpreting a Kp mean difference is limited by the nature of the source Kp product.
First 15 rows and provenance
JSON can be reopened on its own. ZIP contains data, explicit method, Python code, notebook, SVG figure, source/licence notes and file hashes. Code is exported only; this page never executes imported code.
Carry your investigation into the Academy portfolio
This explicit action updates only the matching transit, Kp or geometry draft on this device. Lesson progress and other projects are preserved; corrupt or unknown existing portfolios are never overwritten. Nothing is sent to an editor or account.
Submit for real review through your own WordPress project
First create a report in your account through My First Research / My Research. Here you can select only your own unpublished report with the same data type. The button submits the entire open research object as an attachment and returns the report to the review queue; it does not publish it.
Sign in with my WordPress accountNo package has been uploaded.
Only the Kepler, Kp and labelled shadow-model schema is supported. The server checks source hash, account ownership, version, sharing consent and recomputed results. Author name and ORCID are self-supplied. An editor must separately review source and method. No external cloud archive or DOI registration is created.
Published research objects
This catalogue shows only WordPress attachments with explicit sharing consent, real editorial publication and unchanged approved content. Entries are not sample or fabricated publications. Opening an object downloads its data and verifies the calculation in this browser.
Catalogue not requested yet. The latest 200 published projects are scanned; each page contains up to 20 verified objects.
SCIENTIFIC TRACEABILITY
What should a research object answer?
Where did the data come from?
The Kepler sample comes from KIC 6922244 / Q0. Quality filtering and median scaling were applied before this exercise; original FITS and processing notes are retained. NOAA is a retained product from 17–23 October 2026. Distinguish this immutable selection from a changing online source.
What was calculated?
The package records interval bounds, station filter, uncertainty mode and numeric formulas. The result is recomputed from the same data copy and parameters. Shadow inputs are clearly labelled educational-model values, not measured historical records.
What changed?
Compare title, question, parameters, source data and results between two files. A revision number and the previous object hash record the link; a hash chain is not an independent timestamp or author signature.
Who reviewed it?
This local tool creates no editorial or peer-review approval. Use My First Research / My Research in your WordPress account to submit work. Public publication requires sharing consent and a real editorial action.
A path to an open archive
Archive metadata export carries a title, description, data/method relationships, author and licence notes. This page does not upload files to an external archive or reserve a DOI. Zenodo publication is performed separately with a real account and the archive’s access choices. A DOI or archive record does not imply peer review.